Scroll down to read Take-A-Pen’s 2 Recent Letter-Writing Calls; Last Update: February 15, 2008

LW Call i : Help to dismantle the ‘Muhammad Al Durra Fraud! - UPDATE: Jan.1, 2008, and

LW Call ii : Save SDEROT & Save GAZA!   -   UPDATE:  January 22, 2008

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

LW Call i  - Take-A-Pen’s Letter-Writing Call: Help us to spread the truth about the Muhammad Al Dura image!

Let’s act to further check and discredit the most probably fake France 2 movie about killing Muhammad al-Durra***!

                              ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Can France 2’s famous Muhammad Al Dura film be a fake?

 

 

Famous   frame of the probably fake France TV-2 movie about the alleged killing of   the Palestinian kid Muhammad al-Durra   by Israel,       on
Sept.  30, 2000.

January 22, 2008

A/ New Evidence against the Al Dura Fraud provided by surgeon! - by Endre MOZES* - December 17, 2007 – See on our English page (Click ‘English’ button above)

 

      Read below: 

B/ Reader’s Letter about Al Durra, by Take-A-Pen, published in the Jerusalem JPost :

       “Nothing supports France-2 saying that Israeli soldiers killed the boy” (Nov.22)

C/ Backgrounder about the Al Durra case - by Take-A-Pen*- October 25, 2007, Update: February 15, 2008  -   (Also in English, Russian, Spanish, Dutch, French, German, Hungarian, Finnish, Swedish and Danish on our relevant pages)

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

  B/ Reader’s Letter by Take-A-Pen, published in The Jerusalem Post :

     ”Not a single frame supports France 2’s view that Israeli soldiers killed the Al-Durra boy” 

To the Letter Editor                                 (as published on November 22, 2007)

More important than the personal

Sir, - Re: "Outcry raised over missing minutes in al-Dura film"(Nov.19): It is commendable that the Post is covering this case, which has suffered from insufficient media attention. But I disliked the tone of this article, which repeatedly generalized supporters of Philippe Karsenty’s views such as myself  as 'crying foul', as if this were a football match. 

Our international media-watch organization, Take-A-Pen, has followed this important and tragic case since September 2000.  I traveled to Paris to learn and do more for the truth and not to support a person, though I respect Karsenty's courage in standing up for what he believes.

The article discussed the interesting point that France 2 presented only 18 minutes of footage instead of the known 27 minutes. I saw those 18 minutes together with the jury, and there isn’t a single frame there supporting France 2’s Charles Enderlin’s original voiceover assessment that Israeli soldiers killed the boy, or were involved in his death in any way. On the other hand, I observed and upon request can present many indications that France 2's film was staged; as Philippe Karsenty says.

More important than the personal aspect is the fact that hundreds of millions have believed for years France 2's statement about terrible Israeli brutality committed against a young boy; a belief that today seems totally unfounded.

ENDRE MOZES, Chairman

Take-A-Pen, Haifa

--------------------------------------------------------

 

  C/ Al-Dura Backgrounder by Take-A-Pen*      - October 25, 2007,  Last Update: February 15, 2008

 

   On September 30, 2000 the world watched with horror and pain France 2 TV’s movie showing how a Palestinian boy, Muhammad al-Durrah, was killed in crossfire between Palestinian gunmen and Israeli soldiers.  In his voiceover France 2’s reporter Charles Enderlin asserted (though, as it turned out he had not been present at the event and leant on the sole witness Palestinian cameraman Talal Abu Rahma) that Israel killed the boy, implying it was deliberate.

 

     The footage spread fast across the world, and the images, together with the accusation against Israel, became the most powerful icons of hate; for Palestinians, for the global Jihad and for Israel- and Jew-haters around the world. For an example, Jewish journalist Daniel Pearl's killers used al-Durrah's image in the video showing Pearl's beheading.

 

     Since then more and more experts around the world - and recently the Israeli Defense Forces itself - concluded that the France 2’s al-Durrah movie must have been a forgery and their accusation untrue. Analyses of site layout and ballistic evidence prove IDF soldiers could not shoot the boy.

 

    Sensational Breakthrough on 14 November - Crucial Day in the Court

    France 2 broadcast less than 1 minute of the 27 minutes raw footage shot by Rahma. The full footage could have spilled light on the truth, but France 2 has always refused to make this crucial evidence available to experts or to the public. Instead, they accused French investigating reporter Philippe Karsenty, one of those who said the footage was a fraud, of libel. Last year France 2 almost won the case. Karsenty, despite a recommendation from the prosecutor to rule in his favor, was found guilty and was fined 1 Euro in damages.

    However, on 12 September 2007 the case took a new turn. On that first day of the present appeal trial, the judge ruled that France 2 must submit the entire footage to the court by the next hearing on November 14.  (Take A Pen and its friends, inside and out of our organization, may feel true satisfaction; our previous intensive letter-writing campaign, to TV France 2 and to French President Sarkozy**, had probably contributed to the court’s will to reveal the truth this time.

    On November 14 the next two breakthroughs followed. First of all; France 2 didn’t present the full original raw footage, but 18 minutes only; Secondly, the newly revealed 17 minutes was full of contradictions regarding the authenticity of the footage. And, most importantly, the footage didn’t show a single frame, which supported in any remote way France 2’s statement about Israelis killing the boy, or being involved in his death in any way. Everybody has now a very good reason not to believe any more to France 2’s al-Durrah story, which was literally a ‘one-man-show’, based on the sole eye-witness, the Palestinian cameraman Talal Abu Rahmeh.

 

    Our strong wish is now that the full truth about the Al-Dura case be found. That Philippe Karsenty’s mouth be not shut. That the horrible Al-Dura libel be dismantled. That it perpetrators be discredited forever.

 

    The future? In Paris, the city where Captain Dreyfuss was once unjustly sentenced and much later rehabilitated, TV France 2 may also become from the accuser the libelous party; for disseminating its probably fake Muhammad Al-Durrah movie and the unfounded accusation it made, and for obstructing the finding of truth, by concealing the full raw footage for so long and partly even today.

 

    Take-A-Pen’s chairman was in the Paris courtroom on November 14, to immediately inform You, in a joint project with the prestigious HonestReporting organization, about the outcome of the hearing –  SEE OUR REPORT AND YOUTUBE MOVIE, ON TOP OF THIS HOME PAGE!(Nov. 15, 2007)

    We’ll be in the Paris courtroom again on 27 February 2008, to follow the hearing and, it is reached, to hear the VERDICT, hopefully a positive one. 

----------------------------

   *Endre MOZES, Take-A-Pen’s chairman wrote this backgrounder/editorial, see at http://www.take-a-pen.org/CallForAction/CFA.html

    ** See at http://www.take-a-pen.org/CallForAction/CFA.html

    *** The name Al Dura is written in many forms, incl. al Dura, al-Dura, Al Durra, Al Durrah and more.

 

  

   You may read selected previous letters and articles about this case:

 

(1) Take-A-Pen Chairman’s Letter to President of France, Nicolas Sarkozy; re: the Al-Durrah case - read below

(2) Background info for the Muhammad al-Durrah fake  -  in English and in French:

           http://www.theaugeanstables.com/2006/09/18/cybercast-news-service-weighs-in-on-al-durah-trial/

(3) IDF demands France 2 video of al-Dura shooting -  read below

(4) September 23, 2007 - Dam Bursts at Al Dura Trial! by Nidra Poller - read below

 

  Based on all these you can write your own letter! to your own paper or TV station, asking coverage and proper commentary about the case; or to the court or to President Sarkozy, demanding justice:.  France 2 and not Karsenty is the libelous party.

                    

 

(1)  Take-A-Pen Chairman’s Letter to President Nicolas Sarkozy:

 

To: Le Président de la Republique, Nicolas Sarkozy

      Via Facsimile: 00 33 1 47 42 24 65


Dear President Sarkozy:    September 3, 2007

 

Subject: Trial of Philippe Karsenty about the Mohammed al-Durrah fake - and

               the role of France’s President

Your election to France’s president has changed the world’s spiritual map.  France, one of the world’s opinion leaders, radiates sincerity again.  Many people around the world start to believe again that honest and brave leadership may be stronger than deals and political correctness.

We are approaching you about a complex legal case coming to an appeal court in France soon; where a defamation case, a blood libel against the Israeli people, and the reputation of France, its justice system and its President are at stake.

Below I recall some facts about this case and about the close involvement of the French presidency.


(We, Take-A-Pen, are a global volunteer organization around the world which in 18 languages and in many countries watches the media and public life for their truth or untruth said and done, particularly about Israel and the Middle East. We act and publicly write in defense of the truth.)

 

One of the worse atrocities against truth the world has seen in recent years was the less than a minute long movie of France’s TV-2 about the alleged deliberate killing of a Palestinian boy, Mohammed al-Durrah, by Israel.

This movie and the photos became the most powerful icons of the Palestinians, of global Jihad and of hatred of Israel around the world.

Powerful icons both for honest people who naïvely believed that such cruelty had really happened, and for global Islamist militancy which uses it since then for recruitment to terrorism, for incitement to hatred of their young ones and even as a direct pretext of an estimated at least 500 deaths in the worldwide upheaval Islamists launched after the movie, including the murder of the journalist Daniel Pearl.

Daniel Pearl's killers used al-Durrah's image in the video showing Pearl's beheading.

 

The problem with the France TV-2 movie is that it most probably is an absolute fake.

 

The short al-Durrah show, published and distributed in the whole world free by TV-2, was edited from a forty times (!) longer raw footage. But that raw footage, at least 27 minutes long, was never shown by TV 2 to the world or to professionals who formally requested to see it.

The single witness of the al-Durrah movie’s authenticity was the photographer, Palestinian cameraman Talal Abu Rahma himself. Charles Enderlin, Jerusalem Bureau Chief for France 2 then, had not been present when the al-Durrah movie was shot and apparently did no serious check of authenticity before he released the libelous movie.

 

On the other hand great many signs and professional researches made by German, American, international and French expert teams (including investigating reporter Philippe Karsenty of Paris) indicate that the movie in which the boy supposedly "dies" - is a complete forgery!

Absurd contradictions were found by dozens within that short movie, like: we can hear maybe a hundred shots, but later a recording was found that during the editing of the movie the sound of one shot was endlessly repeated. Or: after the hundreds of shots not one hole was seen in the drum which stood right behind father and son allegedly for 45 minutes of shootings. Or: the ambulance arrived and left the scene within a few seconds; hardly enough for sportsmen to jump into the back of a car; but the evacuation of the injured boy or his body could never be seen. No body or reliable hospital record of the allegedly dead boy was ever found or documented.

 

All circumstantial evidence suggests strongly that a cunning fake made by the photographer combined with the utmost professional negligence by the film’s editor, Charles Enderlin, produced one of the most severe global blood libels of our time.

Release of the crucial evidence held by TV-2 could solve the doubts. It seems that this is exactly what TV-2 wants to avoid.

 

Since then this most ‘successful’ fake propaganda film inspired a whole new Palestinian and Islamist lie industry; whole studios, widely called and documented as ‘Pallywood’, are fabricating staged false ‘news’.

 

In recent years the falsity of TV 2’s al-Durrah movie has gradually became a global consensus. The only way TV-2 could obstruct truth be found and be fully proven, has been its refusal to disclose the full raw footage.

Last September the French court rendered, after then-President Chirac’s rather weird intervention, a judgment against Philippe Karsenty for defamation, in favour of Charles Enderlin and TV-2 television station.

This politicized judgment damaged very seriously the reputation of President Chirac, of the French justice system and of France as a whole.

 

 

Dear President Sarkozy!  On September 12, 2007 Philippe Karsenty will present his appeal to the court against the 2006 judgment.

We are appealing to you now for your support to a fair and not manipulated appeal procedure. 

Of course we are not suggesting that you interfere with the course of justice; but we do suggest that you undo the previous French President’s intervention seemingly against finding the inconvenient truth.

We do request that you support the court ordering France TV-2 to release the crucial evidence: the 27 minutes long footage, filmed by the sole witness cameraman, and never shown to the public or to experts. 

 

True that the release of that evidence and the court’s finding the truth about France 2’s fraud are going to cause embarrassing moments for certain people and institutions.  But such embarrassing moments are going to come anyway.  The question is whether you, France’s President today, are going to be the hero of finding the truth - or its obstructer, as Mr. Chirac may be remembered for a long time.

 

We wish you, to France and Israel, to Philippe Karsenty and the whole world; success for Justice.

 

Respectfully,

Endre MOZES

Chairman of Take-A-Pen

www.take-a-pen.org

mozesey@netvision.net.il

 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

(2)   Background information:

Background info for the Muhammad al-Durrah fake, in English and in French:

http://www.theaugeanstables.com/2006/09/18/cybercast-news-service-weighs-in-on-al-durah-trial/

 

 

(3) UPDATE -  Mohammed al-Dura with father before shot to death (France2 TV)IDF demands France 2 video of al-Dura shooting

ICEJ, Sept. 18, 2007


The IDF has apparently reopened its probe of a highly controversial incident that helped fuel the second Intifada in its earliest days seven years ago, as the Israeli military has requested that the France 2 television network hand over its unedited video of the shooting of 12-year old Mohammed al-Dura in Gaza.


The IDF request comes in the midst of a legal battle between the network and its Israel reporter Charles Enderlin, and French media monitor Philippe Karsenty, who claims France 2 manipulated the video to make it appear that IDF soldiers shot al-Dura. France 2 brought a libel suit against Karsenty and won at trial, but he has appealed the verdict and expects a ruling within days.



The Palestinians turned al-Dura into a leading symbol of the armed intifada and a model of child martyrdom for other Palestinian youths.


"The IDF is dealing directly with the network on the issue," an IDF spokeswoman told
Haaretz on Monday, without explaining why the army had made the request.


The Palestinians blamed the IDF for the boy’s death and the IDF quickly apologized, but a military investigation later concluded that the boy was probably shot dead in a Palestinian crossfire. A local Arab cameraman, Talal Abu Rahma, shot the video for the French network, which widely distributed only 55 seconds of the 27 minutes of film taken.


Among the evidence pointing to Palestinian culpability is the angle of fire and use of automatic weapons, both of which indicate a unit of six IDF soldiers besieged in a nearby pillbox at Netzarim Junction were not responsible for al-Dura's death on September 30, 2000.

 

(4) UPDATE – September 23, 2007:  

Dam Bursts at Al Dura Trial

by Nidra Poller

September 20, 2007

PJM (pajamasmedia) <