READ
BELOW:
1) New! One more Irish-Israeli Love Story -By Endre Mozes- June 1, 2007
2) Reader's Letter to Irish Independent -
There's no alternative to Israeli "wall"
3)
Letter to:
Mary McAleese, Uachtaráin nah Éireann
The PRESIDENT of the
4) Letter to the IRISH TIMES – in June 2007 Relevant again!!!
'BOYCOTT OF ISRAELI COLLEGES '
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
1/One more
Irish-Israeli Love Story - June 1, 2007
By Endre
Mozes Take-A-Pen
We still
remember the visit of 4000 Irish football fans in
Take-A-Pen's
Better News from
Now it's the 'Willin Fools', an Irish music group, which makes a lot of Israelis happy, with Irish music, while in the same time they enjoy themselves in Israel.

Photo: Gleb Volkov 2007
Connor Hughes, the 'Willin Fools' group's leader who plays the mandolin
and sings, says they were accepted with smiles and love wherever they had been
in
On the stage and in the hall it's merry. Connor,
and David the guitarist are in the forefront of the stage with Annemarie and
Jackie, redhead and blonde beauties who sing and play the flute and drum. In
the background lots of further Irish drums and rhythm, joined also by an
Israeli musician devoted to Irish music (there are quite a few such Irish-music
bands in
The first performance of "Willin Fools' in
Clearly this is an
Irish-Israeli LOVE STORY AGAIN.
But in order that it remain such a Love Story
we have to try to keep this story secret before some in the Irish politics and
media. Because according to their actual coverage for recent years such good
news may not fit well into their agenda about
With joy,
Endre from
-----------
|
||||||
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2/Reader's Letter to Irish
Independent:
There's no alternative to Israeli"wall"
Letters -
Friday November 3rd 2006
On the matter of the hardships suffered by Palestinians due to Israel's new
security "wall" I believe it is only right that people in Ireland
hear about
their loss of land or the demolition of their houses due to the building of
the wall, and the suffering which ordinary Palestinians have endured due to
the current phase of the Israeli/Palestinian conflict (Living in the shadow
of the wall, Letters, November 1).
However, a few issues need clarification:
1. The "wall" is actually a wire fence for 97pc of its length,
720km. Less
than three per cent is the high concrete wall which is commonly shown.
And there are multiple entry points along it.
2. The reason it was built was to stop suicide bombing by extremists
within
the Palestinian community. 525 Israelis and others were killed in the 147
suicide bombing attacks which occurred since September, 2000.
Most Palestinian people do not support these suicide attacks. Palestinian
leader Mahmoud Abbas (Abu Mazen) has condemned the attacks, as has the
international community.
3. The "wall" has reduced the terror attacks significantly. In
2002 there
were 60 suicide bombings in
completed in 2003, only 26 suicide attacks occurred. This fell to 15 in 2004
and to seven in 2005.
4. The "wall"/security fence is obviously controversial and has been
condemned by the International Court of Justice as "illegal".
However, the
background to this decision is quite complex. The original resolution at the
UN General Assembly which referred the "wall" issue to the ICJ for
judgement, was proposed by 27, mainly Middle Eastern
states, many of which
whom have appalling human rights records themselves.
Only 90 of the 191 General Assembly members voted for the resolution on the
"wall" as many saw it to be nothing less than an attempt to adopt a
partisan
approach to resolving the issue.
The Israeli/Palestinian conflict of the last 60 years has been a tragedy for
all parties involved and should be resolved, to use a cliche,
politically.
But if we are to suggest to
dismantled, do we have an alternative means of stopping the suicide
bombers from wreaking havoc through their cult of death?
PAUL MACDONALD,
BSc (International politics),
CARLOW
C Irish Independent
http://www.unison.ie/irish_independent/
& http://www.unison.ie/
----------------------------------
3/ LETTER to The
PRESIDENT of the
Mary McAleese
Uachtaráin nah Éireann
Áras an Uachtaráin
Phoenix Park, Dublin 8
Poblacht nah Éireann 3
January 2006
Dear Mary,
It's many years since we met over dinner at Newcastle University, but you (or
your husband) may remember me as Daniel Easterman.
You weren't yet President then, of course, so perhaps I should offer you my
congratulations as well as a word of thanks for the excellent job you've been
doing since then.
The reason I'm writing now is, I fear, not the best with which to start the New
Year, but I feel prompted to do so before the year gets any older.
I have just read that Prime Minister Bertie Ahern
has refused to condemn statements made by former minister Justin Keating on the
subject of
Knowing that
match earlier this year.
Given that anti-Semitism is again on the rise throughout Europe and that
I realize you have an imperative to remain above the political realm, and I
won't ask you to do anything to compromise your position as head of state. But
I do hope that the seriousness of this matter will be apparent to you, and that you may be able to use those powers you have to express an unconditional abhorrence of anti-Semitism in whatever form it expresses itself.
Whatever else you may feel able to do in the present situation is, of
course, entirely at your discretion.
And, having said all that, let me wish you the best of
new years.
Perhaps we'll meet again if you ever come this way.
With all best wishes,
Dr. Denis MacEoin
Royal Literary Fund Fellow
Newcastle University
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
4/ Letter to the IRISH TIMES May 20,2005 – In June 2007Relevant again!!!
BOYCOTT OF ISRAELI COLLEGES
by John Harpur,
Vice-President for Public Relations, Irish Federation of University Teachers
Madam, - In a controversial debate that has received little attention over
here, the UK Association of University Teachers (AUT) on April 22nd passed a
motion at a national AUT council meeting to boycott both Haifa and Bar ILAN
universities.
The Hebrew University of Jerusalem is also a potential target.
The background to the AUT decision is a farrago of ideological analyses and
propaganda relating to the participation of certain Israeli institutions in the
management of the Palestinian issue. In reality
Due to an embedded anti-Semitism in European intellectual culture, it is nearly
impossible to raise rational arguments in defence of
If one recalls the deeply offensive Punch caricatures of "the Oirish" and the crude blanket generalisations
of the Irish in Britain as potential terrorists over the past 30 years, then
one can grasp some minute insight into the portrayal of Israel as replete with
people of one religious and one political persuasion bent on the creation of a
greater Judaea-Sumeria. Of course, the fact that
political life may be less homogenous than that is sometimes inconvenient to
acknowledge in cultures tuned to resonate to anti-Semitism.
It is a fact that there are political movements in
Of course, much of the material misery of the same population could be
ameliorated if the Arab "brothers" dug deep enough into their oil
wealth, as has the global Jewish Diaspora. In the absence of this, we are
treated to tantrums by the AUT.
If the same boycott logic had been applied to Irish colleges because of
individual staff identification with republicanism, would we have progressed to
the Belfast Agreement more slowly - if at all? Would the Republic be trumpeting
its Celtic Tiger legacy?
The end of dialogue marks the end of civility.
Shame on the AUT for
supporting the ending of intellectual commerce with a nation that has suffered
so much indignity historically. -
Yours, etc,
JOHN HARPUR,
Vice-President for Public Relations,
Irish Federation of University Teachers,